Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Science & Spirituality: What is the 'Gravity' of the situation?






It’s really no surprise esoteric thought is drawn to the cosmos. There is something precious about the cold infinity of abyss set afire with clusters of life-giving suns. The ancient saw no distinction whatsoever with the cosmos of Nuit and their god-forms. They were one and wholly the same. Have we lost this in modern times? I often wonder whether it’s the cosmologists and physicists that are now the only real proponents of religious thought. That perhaps the trajectory of religious feeling has been lost on religions and preserved in those that traverse space. Listen to them talk. When NASA landed a spacecraft on the Rosetta Comet in 2014, the press conference revealed much of the state of mind of these off-world travelers. They spoke with reverence. With an air of excitement, these scientists evoked a sense of the sacred much more than anything I’ve seen from current religious milieus. The tone of these scientists reminded me of Wickes when he remarked, “I looked upon space and I beheld darkness. In that darkness moves mysterious forces. Not like the gods of man’s conceiving were they, but strange primeval beings born before the gods of human form. They were hooded in darkness. Through their fingers they drew the threads of blackness and even wove them back and forth.”[1] A plea for the intangible and ethereal and bewildering, these men of science were not unlike their god-fearing predecessors such as Copernicus, Galileo, or Newton.

Hollywood has begun to catch on. Although Kubrick’s 2001 certainly had religious overtones, the more recent Gravity boggles the mind in its blatant use of esoteric paradigms. Watch it again. And for god sake listen to the music. Bullock’s character is separated from the world, undergoes a liminal set of Ordeals and comes blazing back to earth a new Being. The experiences this character has in the vacuum effectively leaves a wreckage of her former self. We bear witness to her dissolving as every possible thing that could go wrong does. Nuit herself is a catalyst and agent of change. It is in the expansiveness of the abyss that we are confronted with the terrifying purge of form that leads to recognition of the immanent. The film is a mystery teaching. Watching it evokes Bendyaev when he wrote that “The absolute is a definitive mystery. God is transcendental; an abyss separates man from him. But the transcendental nature of god is our immanent experience.”[2] In the film’s concluding sequence we see the transformation and utter bewilderment of emerging a new Being. Bullock looks up in almost disbelief of what she just underwent.

It’s a sad state of affairs when our representatives of religion are no more spiritual than the atheists they pretend to despise. When they are paid millions to deliver spiritually empty prayers, ask for more millions, and provide ‘spin’ on secular issues having nothing at all to do with renewal. But it is equally baffling and indeed encouraging to know that science has taken up the mantle. That we can find honest spiritual milieus in government space programs and in privately funded manufacturers such as SpaceX. Who would have thought given the history of science and religion that it would be the scientists that embody the ineffable and mysterious? Perhaps this is what the ancients knew. They knew that in preserving child-like grace they retained the wonder and awe of the numinous event. And while doing so, honor a time before religion became a slave to man. Somewhere, Giordano Bruno and Galileo are having a well-deserved laugh.



[1] Wickes, F. The Inner World Of Man. 1950. Boston. Siglo.
[2] Bendyaev, N. Spirit and Reality. 1946. London. Geoffrey Bles. 

No comments:

Post a Comment