Monday, October 15, 2012

RITUAL AND TRANSITION STATES IN NON-HUMANS: HOW THE GODS ALSO UNDERGO RITES OF PASSAGE PART ONE


Hello, all of you occult and esoteric lovers in the multiverse. For months, i've been blathering on about how deities undergo rites of passage and enter liminal states when their human counterparts perform ritual. I've been screeching and frantically trying to get something down on paper that develops this sordid and clearly antagonistic philosophy. Finally, I've finished part 1 and part 2. Here is part 1- I'll post the sequel tomorrow. This post deals with primarily the ritual and archaeology of the idea whereas the second develops the philosophy of deitic rite of passage. Enjoy and keep the howling to a minimum. 



RITUAL AND TRANSITION STATES IN NON-HUMANS: HOW THE GODS ALSO UNDERGO RITES OF PASSAGE 

PART ONE


The problem with the occult is establishing a consensus of definition. Too often, ‘descriptions’ of the occult are used to provide meaning of the phenomenon. Variances of narrative and/or thematic characteristics are employed to explain not only what the occult is but why it operates in the way it does. This is not surprising. Occult arts and sciences have enormous reach and enter multiple avenues of discourse. The occult is, in many ways, pluralism run rampant. The genre is anthropological and folkloric; it is psychological and sociological. The occult is a favorite of the arts and theatre. It is religious and scientific, conspiratorial, quantum, and mystical.
            But above all else, the occult is experiential. It is something experienced. Just as one cannot adequately explain ‘enlightenment’, ‘disappearance of the ego’, ‘satori’, or ‘absorption into god’, an occult event is a happening. Something happens to both the occult and anybody who is witness to it. In many ways, there is no definition of occult as it happens because there is nothing to be conceptually defined at that moment. As Norman Melchert has remarked, “the conceptual representation of the experience invariably comes afterward, while one is no longer in the grip of it” (Melchert 445). Certainly more Dionysian than Apollonian, this form of mystical experience is surreal and difficult to comprehend.
            Indeed, for anybody who has witnessed a supernatural assault, there is a disorienting and hallucinatory quality that really cannot be adequately explained. And each occult event is unique. It is this inherent having no like or equal that makes each occult happening incommensurable from any other so-called occult event. We see this in a 1975 Ouija experience. According to the account:

On Tuesday evening, Mark and Kent were on their way to MIA when they ran into Stephanie who wasn’t a member of the church. So they went over to Stephanie’s house. They lit the candles on the mantle piece and on the coffee table and began to play the Ouija board at about 7:00pm. They got the Ouija board to work really well and then asked it a lot of questions such as ‘who would marry whom’ and ‘does Suzie like Jimmy’ etc… Then they tried an experiment. Two of them would close their eyes and place their fingers on the Ouija board. The third person would place a ring on the board somewhere and the Ouija would knock it off upon a command from one of the participants. After that Mark wanted to ask the Ouija to show himself but Kent said no. Finally after a lot of prodding, Kent relented. Kent said the atmosphere was really weird and his whole attitude changed. It was about 9:30 pm when Kent asked the Ouija to show himself. At first the Ouija would move off the table. Stephanie and Kent had their fingers on the Ouija while Mark watched. Kent described the room as being really “thick”. Then Kent blacked out and when he woke up from a dream-like experience, he looked up at Stephanie whose face was really distorted and ghoulish. He says her face was that of a demon. Horrified, he screamed and jumped over the coffee table to grab Mark’s knees. He kept telling Mark to look at Stephanie. Stephanie went hysterical and she couldn’t stop crying. Later Mark said that he was frozen to the chair and couldn’t move to look at Stephanie. They looked at the clock and it was 10:30pm. They realized that they had all blacked out for about forty-five minutes. They put the Ouija board in the garage and left. Kent says that he cant stand to be around Stephanie and that that face is still vivid to him at times. (Special Collections & Archives. Merrill-Cazier Library. Utah State University. Folk Coll. 8a, group 7: SNL box 11 Fd 14)

            Such is the atmosphere of many supernatural assault narratives. The experience of the teenagers was indefinable as it occurred. The shock and horror of the moment makes the entire episode unique to itself and completely incommensurable from any other occult narrative. When the moment is gone, conceptual representation can be applied and meaning ascribed but until then, the experience is not unlike visionary trance. Each episode is an autonomous self-serving event. And like visionary trance, logic is suspended in favor of discovery. Moreover, while in that mental state, belief is also suspended. Being in the grip of the experience leaves no room for doubt or belief because the event is happening at that moment. Belief becomes self-evident.  
            In actuality, the occult is an assemblage of representations that lack any clear idea of what they are representative of. The occult is, at the same time, horror stories, initiatory systems, and a symbolic system of correspondences. It is realization of the numinous yet hidden. Occult comes from the Latin word occultus and means secret or veiled. But perhaps in its capacity for creation, the occult re-presents itself continuously. By its very nature, the occult renews the numinous and makes affective experience paramount to its teachings. For an occultist, the feeling of conjuring a non-human is equally as important as the non-human itself.
            What is peculiar about occultists is that they resemble archaeologists and utilize a context of discovery when they go about sifting through temporal and spatial layers of meaning to uncover past ritualization. Their techniques and instrumentation allow them to reveal or part the veil of the past. As negotiators of time and space, they gather artifacts to form an understanding of long-ago cultures. And as more data is revealed, the picture of the past changes accordingly. The imagery archaeological study conjures then, is essential because we are afforded a moment in time. By reconstructing Rome, for example, we observe a moment in history. And without a continuous panoply of data, our picture of Rome would stagnate. Likewise, continuous and uninterrupted discovery of data must be utilized for occult representation to be properly conveyed. This is why the occult is constantly shifting and moving to meet the needs of society.
            It wasn’t always so. Before complex societies, representation of the occult was a solitary experience. The ancient religion of Rome was centered around the practice of maintaining a sacred fire. In every house a hearth-fire was placed at the family Altar. This Altar was lit day and night because the fire was a god who protected the family. But it was a reciprocal relationship. If the fire ceased, then so did the god. In those ancient times, individual gods belonged to individual families. Having gods that belonged only to one family and residing in one house perpetually led to an isolation of families due to the secrecy of the religion that was propogated. [1] Over time, these individual family hearths clustered to form phatry’s and would eventually organize into tribes. As social organization grew, the structure of Rome began to take shape. Coulange notes that, the city Altar was enclosed in what the Greeks called a Pyrataneum and the Romans named the Temple Of Vesta. Therefore, each city had its own gods and calendrical celebrations.[2]
            What was once solitary then city-wide hearths became a pluriverse of pantheons. Gods evolved distinct personalities and interacted among themselves. They developed attitudes and schemed with and against mankind. And narratives were written to biograph their exploits. Moreover, as migrants from places like Egypt and Persia entered into the Roman state, their gods entered into the already complex national religion. Eventually, the Roman population was, a mixture of races, its worship was an assemblage of several worships, and its national hearth an association of several hearths. There was hardly a people that it could not admit to its hearth.[3]
            As population and religious complexity grew, the Imperial Regime suspended the political obligations of ordinary citizens. At this time, the population didn’t even vote. According to Robert Turcan, when the individual no longer played an active part of the running of the city, religious, micro-societies, and mystery sects assured the individual a kind of reintegration and existence.[4] When exotic foreign gods coupled with the already robust Greco-Roman pantheon, they facilitated a creation of initiatory-based mystery schools. It is these same schools that have served as the prototype to hierarchal initiatory systems since the 17th century.



ELEUSIS AND EGYPT: A PROTOTYPE OF THE MODERN OCCULT RITUAL:

“To elevate man above the human sphere into the divine and assure his redemption by making him a god and so conferring immortality upon him.” – Martin P. Nilsson, Greek Popular Religion, “The Religion of Eleusis.” Colombia University Press. 1947. New York. pp. 42-64


            Eleusis is located fourteen miles from Athens and in antiquity, was a prospering religious haven for many of the mystery religions. The most famous of these was the eleusinian cult that worshiped Demeter and Persephone.
            According to myth, Persephone was picking flowers one day when the ground split upon and a black chariot with invisible driver rose up and abducted her. Taken by Hades into the underworld, the young maiden became she who brings destruction. This re-embodiment of the goddess into something terrifying led to social anxieties attached to the cult. In fact, the word Persephone instilled such a terror that it was rarely used. According to Michael Cosmopoulos, prayers to Persephone were either prayers to the dead or curses on the living. No parent ever considered naming a daughter after her, and it should be no surprise to discover that even the place she dwelt had no name of its own.[5]
            Much like ancient Egyptian narratives of Osiris and Isis, the Demeter-Persephone relationship involve purification and the loss of a loved one. Demeter searches for her daughter and as she does, all vegetation begins to die. During this period, she took the alias Doso and worked as nursemaid to the two sons of King Celeus. Demeter sought to make Demophon a god by giving him the divine breath, anointing him in ambrosia, and burning his immortality away in the family-hearth. One night, the boy’s mother walked in while her son was in the fire and became horrified.
            Narratives of Isis also involve purification through the use of fire. In Egyptian myth, Isis discovered that Osiris was trapped in a wooden pillar at the royal palace of Byblos. She disguised herself and took a job nursing the young princes of the royal household. Much like Demeter, the Egyptian goddess threw the boy into the family-hearth at night. The queen walked in one evening and discovered the prince in the fire. Revealing herself as a goddess, Isis admonished the queen for robbing her son of immortality.
            Although these events are perhaps secondary to the main action of the mythos, they still resonate in occult importance. The use of fire is essential in astrological understanding. Often times, fire denotes the creative spirit. Alchemy and Tarot also make use of fire as an agent of transformation. And this is key. Throwing the princes in the hearth-fire was a way to awaken their potentialities for enlightenment or absorption into God. It was an initiation and their becoming.
            The success of the mystery ritual occurs when mother and daughter are reunited in the confines of the Telesterion. One of the primary centres of the Eleusinian mysteries, this building is where the dramatization of Persephone’s return was revealed to initiates. The mystae were blindfolded and made to wander through the dark. Reliving Persephone’s terror in the underworld, these initiates had the subjective experience of being the goddess. They knew what it felt like to be in Hades domain. According to Cosmopoulos, the Epoptai (more advanced initiates) who are waiting outside the Telesterion could see Persephone, together with her mother, emerging from the cave precinct where she arose from the underworld. The light that came from within the Telesterion came, I imagine, from the torches that were suddenly lit by the hundreds, perhaps thousands, of these Epoptai standing at the steps that line the walls of the Telesterion. It was at this moment that the mystae entered and beheld the image of the reunited goddesses.[6]  
            Now, compare the Eleusinian mystery with its Egyptian counterpart. Initiates first went through a purification ceremony which readied them for their ultimate becoming. When nighttime came, the initiate was dressed in a linen robe never previously worn. Then the priest took him by the hand and lead him to the remotest part of the sanctuary or penetralia. The neophyte was probably shown statues that were concealed from the gaze of ordinary followers. The ritual then enacts the symbolic death that corresponded with Osiris. By dying to his former life, the man was reborn as a god. According to Turcan, this moment occurred in the middle of the sanctuary, a platform was set up which the new initiate mounted, this time clad in an embroidered linen robe…when the curtains were drawn, he was revealed like a statue, crowned with palm-leaves and armed with a torch, for the admiration of the faithful, who filed slowly past his feet. [7] Just like the Eleusinian narrative, the initiate undergoes a change of consciousness. In ritually becoming the deity, each candidate undergoes a rite of passage. They now understand what it feels like to be the deity.
            Such a statement would be meaningless if the deity didn’t also undergo a rite of passage. This is what occultists seek to understand. What are the mechanisms that lead to liminal or transition states in a non-human?

 
             


[1] Fustel De Coulange, The Ancient City: A Study of the Religion, Laws, and Institutions of Greece and Rome. Willard Small Publishing. 1901.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Robert Turcan, The Cults of the Roman Empire. Blackwell Publishing. 1996.
[5] Michael B. Cosmopoulos, Greek Mysteries: The Archaeology and Ritual of Ancient Greek Secret Cults. Routledge Publishing. 2003.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Turcan 1996.

No comments:

Post a Comment