Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Epic laws of the occult.

It amazes me how journalists who have no real background or contextual knowledge in the occult choose to write slaphappy articles about occult material. In the old days, if somebody sought to disparage an esoteric group, they were fully aware of the potential for a strong push off a short bridge or a meeting with a rock hurled at fast-ball speed. It was a break neck business. Secrecy was more guarded than the abandoned hangars at Area 51 and with as much force. There’s the line, cross it at your own peril. In the times of the Eleusinian mysteries of ancient Greece, a blabbermouth could likely end up with a mouthful of blood or worse if he disrespected the secrets of initiation. And still to this day, there are those who tread on supernatural ground completely oblivious to the ten foot demon looming behind them with razor-sharp fangs, an ugly disposition, and the propensity to incur real psychological harm just for the sport of it.
On August 2, 2011, reporter Zen Gardner wrote an article about the “11 occult secrets now in the open.” Although the piece was written in a semi-candid style, there was a treacherous undercurrent of maliciousness that seeped out of its pores. Indeed, I felt as though I needed a good shower after reading this sordid piece of fear mongering and inaccuracy. Good old Zen seems to triumphantly assert that he has seen through the veil of occult secrecy and it’s a place of ‘hidden agendas’, clandestine operations, and smug nastiness. Capitalizing on the rumor-panics of the past, the author seeks to undermine occult processes by perpetuating an ‘in the know’ attitude; when in fact, the dirty dingbat probably has no experience with the occult at all. Here’s a summation of his uncovered secrets.
1)      Paradigm shift- We’re entering a vibrational shift over a period of time.
2)      2012 – Many environmental changes.
3)      Emergence of illuminati and occult-based world.
4)      Control of world by freemasons and corporate world.
5)      Zionist agenda.
6)      Vatican assassins.
7)      Human/extraterrestrial – intervention theory.
8)      Religion makes a move to subjugate the masses.
9)      Prevalence of mental-conditioning machine.
10)  Mind control.
11)  The occult fears mainstream world culture.

Even I’m perplexed at the sheer lunacy of some of these assertions. Mind control, a mental-conditioning machine, and Vatican assassins? This author is more paranoid than  Dali lost at Disneyland with a head full of hashish and no map out of toon town. A horrific absurdity. When in fact, the occult is arguably an entity with minimal secrets. In what I call the five epic laws of occult folklore, the arts and sciences of this genre follow distinct patterning and methodology. These laws can be judiciously described as: 1) The law of correspondences 2) The law of contrasts 3) The law of hierarchy 4) The rite of revealing 5) The dying god motif.
The law of correspondences gives form to the magic and mystery of occultic folklore. Participants engage in a highly sophisticated and complex set of symbolic correspondences utilized to glean subtle insights into the cognitive processes of the psyche. It is a method of self-perfection and its goal theophanic realization. Some of these correspondences include pictorial, numerical, and liturgical archetypes used as foundations for belief and disseminated through the teacher/pupil formula.
In the law of contrast, polarity becomes a key concept in understanding the meaning of the narratives. Working with the use of reversals, contrast becomes a way of defining a constituent unit through the association with its opposite. For example, this is the idea behind the Judaic Sephiroth and Qliphoth. According to Judaic mysticism, ten Sephiroth or emanations make up the ‘Tree of Life’. These stages of consciousness represent esoteric growth in the practitioner. Conversely, each Sephiroth also has a Qliphoth or ‘shell’ that acts as an opposite or adversary to its counterpart. Whereas a Sephiroth has a corresponding angel, the Qliphoth has a corresponding demon and so on. There are a plethora of contrasting principles in occult folklore. And most times they are reconciled by a third autonomous entity or principle.
Occult folklore also makes use of the law of hierarchy as a way to define the various steps that elucidate esoteric knowledge. The hierarchy usually begins with a probationary period in which the initiate is not yet a member of the lodge but undergoes a temporary period of purification. In Freemasonry, this time period is called the Entered Apprentice stage. It is a phase of preparation and the duty is to awaken latent powers within. The symbol of this step is one of youth. Its tarot attribution would be The Fool. An initiate beginning the esoteric journey yet full of promise and inherent power. According to Manly Hall, the “Entered Apprentice must realize that his body is the living temple of the living god and treat it accordingly; for when he abuses or mistreats it he breaks the sacred obligations which he must assume before he can ever hope to understand the true mysteries of the craft” (47). During this time period, the fledgling is encouraged proper diet, exercise, and mental preparation. The hierarchal structure accelerates higher and more advanced degrees as the pupil continues his study and ritual.
The law of revealing makes use of an unveiling to instill insights into sacred. Often times, there is a sudden shock that accompanies this unveiling. It is also a way to pass on esoteric knowledge by accentuating the secrecy of initiation. The neophyte is literally in the dark before the secret is passed to him. The law of revealing is a rite. It makes use of ritualism and symbol to emphasize the numinous qualities of the supernatural. Nowhere is the rite of revealing more prevalent than in the mysteries of ancient Eleusis. The mystae, or first-time initiates were blindfolded and made to wander through the dark. Like the goddess Persephone, the initiates themselves suffered the terror of being in the underworld. Michael Cosmopoulos states that, “the Epoptae (advanced initiates) who are waiting outside the Telesterion could see her (Persephone) together with her mother, emerging from the cave precinct where she arose from the underworld. The light that came from within the Telesterion came, I imagine, from the torches that were suddenly lit by the hundreds perhaps thousands of these Epoptae standing on the steps that line the walls of the Telesterion. It was at this moment that the neophytes entered and beheld the image of the reunited goddesses” (2003: 67). The sense of shock that accompanied this revealing was an integral part of the Eleusinian mystery. It both exhibited a sense of awe and imparted an important esoteric teaching.
The dying god motif is nothing new to students of religion and mysticism. From Osiris to Jesus to Hiram Abiff, the idea of dying and being reborn is an essential aspect of occult folklore. We see this in the ritualization of ancient Egypt. Initiates first went through a purification ceremony in which water was used to ready them for their ultimate becoming. When nighttime came, the initiate was dressed in a linen robe never previously worn and led him to the remotest part of the sanctuary or penetralia. The next part of the ceremony is important because it deals with the neophyte going through his symbolic death. By dying to this former life, the man was reborn as a god. According to Robert Turcan, this moment occurred “in the middle of the sanctuary, a platform was set up which the new initiate mounted. When the curtains were drawn, he was revealed ‘like a statue’, crowned with palm-leaves and armed with a torch, for the admiration of the faithful who filed slowly past his feet” (1997: 72). Here we see the rite of revealing leading into the dying god motif. The neophyte was revealed as a statue or more accurately, as a god to his fellow brethren.
When the occult chickens come home to roost, it becomes apparent that though there is secrecy as part of the occult, in no way does that secrecy imply some ‘nefarious agenda’ on the part of the practitioners. However, there are epic laws that govern the ritual and symbol of the occult. These laws largely stem from the past but remain legitimate in modern times. If uninformed journalists want to stick their nose in occult business they are certainly welcome to do so but shouldn’t be surprised when occultists flog them like a mule. So what? It wouldn’t be the first time somebody has received a vicious beat-down for wandering into uncharted depths. In this day and age, we can’t be too careful. The tide is coming in fast.        

Thursday, August 4, 2011

New blog- Some Satanism for ya!

Hello my beautiful minions. Here is another blog for you reading pleasure. This one is an article on theistic satanism, followed by a note from management and Mad Doctor Abdullah's editorial response to the previous Satanism article. I should probably tell you that the Mad Doctor is a new writer and editor of Magus Magazine. We've put him on a probational period of 90 days to ascertain whether this crazed beast is potty trained and can get along with civilized society. Personally, I think he's vile and should go back to the jungle. I'll gouge out his eyes if he runs wild or is generally unseemly.


In life one should be like the wolf and stalk business, when one finds the prey weak, wait and be patient then attack with all the skills you have. 

Tom/ CEO   Flagship Media


Addressing our Deity
Some Definitions….Guide to Theistic Satanism for the Serious!
Tenants of Theistic Satanism by The Church of Theistic Satanism.
Temples of Satan Founder Grand Magister Blackwood:

For years people have written me asking if they are appropriate in addressing Satan as some of the following and I have decided to answer a few of these questions to provide a clearer understanding to the Real Satanist.

Our Father: Our Father, is a Christian Salutation, however it is acceptable if one believes that Father Satan had a hand in much of creation, or has been a Father to man’s understanding.
Lets examine Father:

Definitions of Father:
a male parent (also used as a term of address to your father); “his father was born in Atlanta”
forefather: the founder of a family; “keep the faith of our forefathers”
`Father’ is a term of address for priests in some churches (especially the Roman Catholic Church or the Orthodox Catholic Church); `Padre’ is frequently used in the military
a person who holds an important or distinguished position in some organization; “the tennis fathers ruled in her favor”; “the city fathers endorsed the proposal”
God when considered as the first person in the Trinity; “hear our prayers, Heavenly Father”
founder: a person who founds or establishes some institution; “George Washington is the father of his country”
beget: make children; “Abraham begot Isaac”; “Men often father children but don’t recognize them”
don: the head of an organized crime family.
So how do any of these fit Satan?
It could be representative of of our founding, and we are the offspring thereof or because of him.
Some other salutations that are often acceptable:
Hail Satan:
Definitions of Hail
acclaim: praise vociferously; “The critics hailed the young pianist as a new Rubinstein”
be a native of; “She hails from Kalamazoo”
call for; “hail a cab”
precipitation of ice pellets when there are strong rising air currents
greet enthusiastically or joyfully
many objects thrown forcefully through the air; “a hail of pebbles”; “a hail of bullets”
precipitate as small ice particles; “It hailed for an hour.
So we find Hail Satan to be greeting the deity enthusiastically.
And of course we all know what Satan is so I will not ramble on, and next we find ourselves often saying Avete Satanas lets define the both of them.
Definitions of Avete:
Refers to Hello in Latin, so Hello Satan is that like Hello Kitty?
Not really some use it in formal greetings of other Satanist’s.
Definitions of satanas:
Satan (Hebrew: הַשָׂטָן ha-Satan (“the accuser”); Persian “sheytân”; Arabic: الشيطان al-Shaitan (“the adversary”) – both from the Semitic root: Ś-Ṭ-N) is an embodiment of antagonism that originates from the Abrahamic religions, being traditionally considered an angel in Judeo-Christian belief …
Even though Satan extends further back than Persia or even Abrahamic Religions dare to go, I believe it is an acceptable name for the True Deity, and while he appears throughout History with many names, he is not:
Pan ( a Pagan Woodland God some say is connected but is not.) When reading into the entire story we can easily discredit Pan.
Lucifer (light bringer and Italian God of Light, some people say connected to Christ).
What the construct of Christianity, a fallen angel is not Satan.
Set (was killed later so is not Satan).
Seth ( a version of Set and some people have derived Setan from the verbiage)
Prometheus (a version of Lucifer) Some are enamored with his story, and is similar but open for debate.
Sumerian Scholars suggest the Root of Satanism is more like Nanna (Sin) or Ningazhidda or Shidaaz, the later is relative to the Night and Moon.
But more on that in later articles!
Back to Salutation:
Some people call him Master:
Definitions of Master.
maestro: an artist of consummate skill; “a master of the violin”; “one of the old masters”
overlord: a person who has general authority over others
victor: a combatant who is able to defeat rivals
directs the work of others
headmaster: presiding officer of a school
an original creation (i.e., an audio recording) from which copies can be made
be or become completely proficient or skilled in; “She mastered Japanese in less than two years”
an officer who is licensed to command a merchant ship
overcome: get on top of; deal with successfully; “He overcame his shyness”
someone who holds a Master’s degree from academic institution
dominate: have dominance or the power to defeat over; “Her pain completely mastered her”; “The methods can master the problems”
an authority qualified to teach apprentices
have a firm understanding or knowledge of; be on top of; “Do you control these data?”
passkey: key that secures entrance everywhere
chief(a): most important element; “the chief aim of living”; “the main doors were of solid glass”; “the principal rivers of America”; “the principal example”; “policemen were primary targets”; “the master bedroom”; “a master switch.”
So for those who are claiming Master is like the “slave mentality” nothing is more incorrect.
I often refer it to being a Soldier to Satan:
Definitions of soldier:
an enlisted man or woman who serves in an army; “the soldiers stood at attention”
serve as a soldier in the military
a wingless sterile ant or termite having a large head and powerful jaws adapted for defending the colony
Now some will say this is wrong but in Theistic Satanism, Satan requires an Army of people who understand his world.
Sometimes people speak of following Satan.
Definitions of follower:
a person who accepts the leadership of another.
someone who travels behind or pursues another.
Faith is important to the Deity, I will here define a few more things.
Definitions of deity:
any supernatural being worshiped as controlling some part of the world or some aspect of life or who is the personification of a force.
I refer to the deity to avoid disrespecting other peoples deity, however as a Theistic Satanist we should really not care because it’s our deity the strongest deity and able to destroy the others at will.
But enough!
I will define a few other things Christians like to label and theirs.
Definitions of faith:
religion: a strong belief in a supernatural power or powers that control human destiny; “he lost his faith but not his morality”
complete confidence in a person or plan etc; “he cherished the faith of a good woman”; “the doctor-patient relationship is based on trust”
religion: an institution to express belief in a divine power; “he was raised in the Baptist religion”; “a member of his own faith contradicted him”
loyalty or allegiance to a cause or a person; “keep the faith”; “they broke faith with their investors”
Faith is not owned by Abrahamic Religions and for Modern Satanist’s they will rail against those of us who display Faith as they prefer to see things from a Atheistic Intent.
Definitions of religion:
a strong belief in a supernatural power or powers that control human destiny; “he lost his faith but not his morality”
an institution to express belief in a divine power; “he was raised in the Baptist religion”; “a member of his own faith contradicted him”
Belief in a deity is similar in religions throughout the world and but Theistic Satanism requires some understanding and yet it prevails as the most powerful magic based religion on the planet, I personally am glad people have tried to whittle down its tenants and have attempted to define it as something else, but here it is.
Theism in the broadest sense is the belief in at least one deity. In a more specific sense, theism refers to a particular doctrine concerning the nature of a god and his relationship to the universe, being Theistic is the action thereof.
Some things that are useful in its practice is the arts:
The Art of Meditation:
Definitions of meditation:
continuous and profound contemplation or musing on a subject or series of subjects of a deep or abstruse nature; “the habit of meditation is the basis for all real knowledge”
(religion) contemplation of spiritual matters (usually on religious or philosophical subjects).
The Art of Invocation:
Definitions of invocation:
a prayer asking God’s help as part of a religious service
an incantation used in conjuring or summoning a devil
conjuring: calling up a spirit or devil
the act of appealing for help.
The Art of Incantation:
An incantation or incantations are the words spoken during a ritual, either a hymn or prayer invoking or praising a deity, or in magic, occultism, witchcraft with the intention of casting a spell on an object or a person. The term derives from Latin(incantare).
The Art of Spell-Craft
Definitions of Spellcraft:
Spellcraft is the ability to cast and work spells. It is often used to describe the rituals performed by witches, Wiccans, and Neo-pagans. Such instances of spellcraft can require the use of various gems, herbs, incense, candles, colours, meditation, chanting, astrology, and numerology.

The Art of Ritual:
Definitions of ritual:
any customary observance or practice
the prescribed procedure for conducting religious ceremonies
of or relating to or characteristic of religious rituals; “ritual killing”
stereotyped behavior.

The Art of Prayer:
Definitions of prayer:
the act of communicating with a deity (especially as a petition or in adoration or contrition or thanksgiving); “the priest sank to his knees in prayer”
reverent petition to a deity
entreaty: earnest or urgent request; “an entreaty to stop the fighting”; “an appeal for help”; “an appeal to the public to keep calm”
a fixed text used in praying.
someone who prays to a God.
While I pray several times a day, I recommend those in Theistic Satanism to pray at least once a day and thank Satan for many different things, including guidance, it is necessary to become Spiritual with Satan.
Definitions of spiritual:
religious: concerned with sacred matters or religion or the church; “religious texts”; “a member of a religious order”; “lords temporal and spiritual”; “spiritual leaders”; “spiritual songs”
concerned with or affecting the spirit or soul; “a spiritual approach to life”; “spiritual fulfillment”; “spiritual values”; “unearthly love”
lacking material body or form or substance; “spiritual beings”; “the vital transcendental soul belonging to the spiritual realm”-Lewis Mumford
a kind of religious song originated by Blacks in the southern United States
apparitional: resembling or characteristic of a phantom; “a ghostly face at the window”; “a phantasmal presence in the room”; “spectral emanations”; “spiritual tappings at a seance”
While people often think they are being spiritual they sometimes as not, I would have to contemplate being spiritual as an Art or The Art of Spirituality.
This can stem from faith as well and could be formed from prayer and or ritual.
Messages come clearly to those with Faith or Spirituality and slow for those not immersed in such.
Now comes the age old question as to where does the Theistic Satanist’s go when they die?
After long hours of research I surmise that we are reborn over and over because we are comprised of energy, however some people do think we have past lives, but I have a theory while some seem to be precognitive of a past life, we cannot control where we go or who be return as, because our essence which is comprised of energy is uncontrollable at death.
So we a merely a husk that contains an energy that can prosper or fail based on our level of Faith or Spirituality and the stronger we are the better chance we have to survive beyond our bodies.
We should do as can while we are in our bodies and in order to work from beyond our bodies we require a certain level of internal faith to push us path the throes of death and into our next lives serving Satan, while his plan may or may not be complete we do not move along like “Lab Rats” in some experiment we move along as travelers and we chart our own futures by actions of Faith while our energy lives.
One does not have to be rich or well to do to thrive around the deity, just have Faith he understands we all have a mission, a place and no matter how downtrodden you become you must rise up and realize there is a better place and perhaps a better life somewhere in your future, so no matter how low you feel you can never loose your faith.

Hail Satanist’s!
Grand Magister Blackwood 


 
POSTSCRIPT:

I should let the rabid readers of this grotesque abomination know that I purposefully included the previous article unedited and in its entirety. Wanting to capture both the essence and idiosyncrasies of the author’s POV, it was felt that the passion of the article would be compromised if subjected to heavy alterations. And because I’m the lead editor of this outfit, I can do that.

                                                            -Management-

PSS- Urinating on the floor of the lavatory will not be tolerated and is subjected to immediate dismissal. My god people, puddles of stench are simply below the bar. Do I have to get you all litter boxes?

                                                                                    Yours sincerely,                                                                                                                        Mad Doctor Abdullah.


EDITORIAL RESPONSE TO ‘MODERN SATANISM’: 

            Upon inclusion of Tom’s article on theistic Satanism, I was fortunate enough to interview a group of Satanists that provided a much needed contextual understanding of the movement. Contrary to popular belief, I never even saw the fangs. The evil eye must have been closed and I got not a hint of anti-Christian jabbering or that steely look that directly precludes a beating. They all seemed relatively coherent and even sane by my standards. But that’s not saying much, I’d interview an iguana if I thought it would say something instructive about the occult or at the very least, teach me to catch flies with my tongue. Or is that a frog? It doesn’t matter now but these Satanists have got me so discombobulated with the idea of a rational Satanism that I’m beginning to wonder how I missed the exodus or mass evolution of an entire ideology that’s been hated since the beginning of time. I must be slipping.
            Now I know what you’re thinking, “Jesus God! Have you no shame? Are you absolutely intent on making whatever fabric of divinity that’s in your soul a spiritual roadkill? Are you mad?” But you don’t understand. According to my interviewees, there are over 200 sects of modern Satanism and some are even atheistic. Modern Satanism offers a veritable smorgasbord of anti-conformist ideas and even a health plan to boot. In fact, the Laveyans (based on the ethos of one Anton Lavey) are one of the few groups that actually embrace traditional satanic imagery. Many Satanists have left the horns, pitchfork, and premodern Bacchic or Pan motifs on the side of HWY 666. Still others will assert that God doesn’t exist and the fun is in “opposing the people that support him.” (Informant interview 2011) When I asked whether not believing in an all-powerful deity is closer to atheism or even existentialism, and that these Satanists are not even Satanists, I was prepared for a verbal or maybe physical lashing to show how evil they can really be. But alas! No such abuse occurred. What I found was a surprisingly lucid and rational group of people that spoke of self-empowerment.
            Many modern Satanic ideas beg of perfection of the Self and individualism. Because of the taboos still associated with Satanic ideology, many adherents strive to stay ‘underground’ or away from the limelight. One informant stated that, “LHP is a singular path, only you can do what is best for you.” (Informant interview 2011) Now that doesn’t seem monstrous to me. It doesn’t even sound all-that controversial. However, some Satanists do consider themselves occult and even practice magic to achieve personal growth. These theistic Satanists use ritual and belief to “bring themselves out of the abyss”. (Ibid) In this regard, Satanism is not about evil. It’s about promoting the Self above good and evil.
            Now I know that these ideas are comparable to Crowley’s Thelema and even find it ironic that modern Satanists seek to “bring themselves out of the abyss” whereas Crowley used every conceivable method to get lost within it. Makes me wonder whether Crowley was a true Satanist and modern Satanism a product of Thelemic metaphysics. But if I wander along that line of thinking, I’m apt to entertain the idea that Satanists are really Luciferian Christians or Satanic Christians. And that’s just too damn confusing without a bottle of wine or codeine. After all, one of my interviewees did state that Satanists are more “almost Christian” whereas Thelemites say, “Fuck you! I will do whatever I damn well please.” And maybe that’s the point. Maybe the near-Christian ritualization and use of reversals provides a structure that Thelema has yet to adopt.
Aside from the fact that Thelemites do embrace Crowley’s formulas and operations into magic; and that some of these operations are so maddeningly complex they drive a novice into hysterics, maybe there is room for discussion between the two camps. I would obviously disagree and warn anybody that putting these two groups together in the same room is akin to releasing two starved wolverines onto a pack of chickens. It’s not gonna matter who or what is said, only that feathers are gonna fly and screeching is going to occur. What a bloodbath! I hate to think of the aftermath of such a meeting. Deep psychological damage. Maybe an audience between these groups could be civilized if a mediator maintains order. In the likeness of a referee or umpire, bets could be placed and a point spread established. The two combatants stand nose to nose at the weigh in and jostle some, “I’m gonna get you sucka!” at their opponents. Sweet Jesus! I’m babbling about a title bout between Satanism and Thelema and nobody has the good sense to throw a rotten tomato at the very least. In summing up, it occurs to me that modern Satanism is surprisingly rational and maybe more importantly, concerned with reason. An empowerment of the Self is an honorable goal for anyone and from what I’ve deduced based on my very limited experience with Satanic ideology, the movement is wrought with positivity and love among its members. Maybe Satanism gets a bad rap and should be reevaluated based on belief study and community.             

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

UFO and occult imagery


 Well hello again!  Thought I'd publish an excerpt of my MS Thesis that is also being included in next month's printing run! UFOs are an amazing aspect of modern folklore and their occult connotations are fascinating! Looking forward to including a plethora of articles that include UFOs and paranormal as part of 'Occult Folklore'. Anyways, here is a sneak peak of the thesis. I'll be finishing and defending the paper next semester so give it a look and wish me luck in the next few months!!!!!

            On the evening of July 14, a Pan American airliner, flying at 8000 feet, was approaching Norfolk, Virginia, en route to Miami from New York. Except for a few thin cirrus clouds above 12,000 feet, the night was clear and visibility unlimited. Shortly after 8 PM., Captain William B. Nash caught sight of a red brilliance in the sky, apparently beyond and to the east of Newport News. “Almost immediately,” they later reported,
We perceived…six bright objects streaking towards us at tremendous speed…they had the fiery aspect of hot coals, but of much greater glow- perhaps twenty times more brilliant (than city lights below)…their shape was clearly outlined and evidently circular; the edges were well defined, not phosphorescent of fuzzy…the red orange was uniform over the upper surface of each craft.
All together, they flipped on edge, the sides to the left of us going up and the glowing surfaces facing right…they were much like coins…then, without an arc or swerve at all, they flipped back together to the flat altitude and darted off in a direction that formed a sharp angle with their first course…the change…was acute…like a ball ricocheting off a wall.
Captain Nash estimated that the unlighted exposed edges of each craft were about fifteen feet thick and their top surfaces flat. As two additional craft suddenly joined the six, the lights of all eight blinked off, then back on. Remaining in a straight line, the UFOs zoomed westward, climbing in a graceful arc as their lights blinked out…one by one. The entire display lasted fifteen seconds.


            This account of UFOs being witnessed in a common staple in Ufological legendry.

As a form of supernatural narrative, the UFO legend has become a popular piece of

modern culture. Similar to stories about heavenly beings or demonic entities, the modern

UFO legend is both shaped and interpreted by cultural context.

            UFO narratives are instilled with numinous qualities that we typically find in

religious studies and the occult. Utilizing imagery of the sacred, sightings of UFO

phenomenon have borrowed from religion and myth in their interpretation. Keith

Thompson remarks that, “classical theologians who adhered to the great chain/hierarchy

of angels model of the universe, and modern-day Ufologists who catalog various types

of aliens, can be viewed as detectives following the same scent” (228). Much like visions
of angels or the terrors of hell, the modern UFO contactee encounters something that

is akin to religious experience.

            Mythological themes are also prevalent in the UFO sighting. Much like the use of

angels in religion, ufology touches upon very important myth-motifs in its explanation.

Bullard remarks that, “UFO stories echo unmistakable leitmotifs of the great

mythological themes: culture bearers and saucers from the sky, supernatural enemies and

the end of the world, ritual is initiation and transformation, interbreeding with otherworld

entities, magical events, and trickster figures like men in black” (277). Using the occult

and traditional religious visions, the UFO employs paradigms of the sacred as a template

for understanding.

It is my contention that the imagery of the alien has taken the place of

angels and demons in traditional folklore and fulfils a need for the sacred albeit in

scientific or technological guise. Throughout the course of this paper, I will examine

the religious symbols and imagery of UFO legendry. By better understanding the

religious imagery of this legend, we are afforded a signpost for what the symbols mean

and what kind of reality they conjure up. As part of my research for this paper, I will be

collecting instances of ufology in newsprint and the media. Since newspapers and

tabloids are a perfect platform for legend dissemination, I will show how religious

imagery is prevalent in UFO folklore.

The supernatural has enjoyed an astronomical increase in popularity in modern

times. Between television programs such as ‘Ghosthunters’ and Hollywood films like

‘The Blair Witch Project’, the occult and supernatural have saturated modern culture in a

variety of ghosts, UFOs, and monsters. The news-media has also printed a plethora of

articles that target the supernatural. Much of these stories carry religious imagery or

theological motifs. Bill Ellis remarks that, “Satan is alive and well, and the local

newspaper regularly prints petitions to various saints and divine beings” (115). This

religious imagery is a common characteristic of supernatural occurrences. Made popular

by mass media, otherworldly entities commonly mingle with ideas of the sacred in their

representation.

            Academia has studied the popularity of the supernatural in modern society. In fact,

many folklorists devote entire books on supernatural narratives and legend formation.

Often times, the supernatural is a college course and professors assign readings and

discussion based upon supernatural narratives. It is no surprise that these classes typically

fill up and even have waiting lists. The popularity of the occult and supernatural is a

rampant force that appeals to our sense of mystery and mysticism.

            Much of the popularity that accompanies the supernatural ultimately stems from

our wanting to believe in the phenomenon. For example, Jan Harold Brunvand has

conducted surveys “indicating that the level of “superstition” among American college

students has remained at a steady, high rate since the beginning of the century” (223-225).

And Gillian Bennett has shown that “one fifth of the American population has frequently

experienced paranormal events, including extrasensory perception, clairvoyance, and

communication with the dead” (9-14). These high percentages of belief in the

supernatural indicate the popularity of the genre in modern culture. As a way to delve

into our own ideologies, the occult sciences and supernatural are an enduring aspect of

society.

            Along with ghosts, and revenants, the UFO may be the most popular folkloric

narrative in modern culture. Numerous books and movies have detailed the various

attributes and behaviors of these otherworldly visitors. Peter Rojcewicz published an

account in 1987 that shows the almost fanatical devotion UFO believers have in the

phenomenon. According to the narrative:

Instructed by a folklore professor to read a book on UFOs, a graduate student looked up to find a gaunt, pale man dressed in a black suit, shoes, and a string tie inquiring about his reading. When the student commented that he did not find the book very interesting, the man in black screamed, “Flying saucers are the most important fact of the century, and you’re not interested?” The student calmed the stranger down, who placed his hand on the student’s shoulder and said something like, “Go well on your purpose.” It sounded religious, the student later recalled… I didn’t look up to see him go. Within seconds, though, he was flooded with anxiety, sensing that the strange man was “otherworldly”.  (1987:148-160)

Whether or not UFOs are the most important fact of the century is open to debate.

Nevertheless, the narrative shows the popularity of UFOs in modern society. It is also

interesting that the student intuits the stranger could be supernatural. Showing just how

ingrained ideas of the supernatural are in the psyche, the student wonders if he himself

just had a ‘close encounter’. These deeply embedded ideas of the supernatural are

perpetuated by the popularity they receive in modern culture.

            Newspapers and tabloids are a valuable source for studying folkloric material in

mass media. As a vehicle for consumption and distribution, the news-presses provide

scholars with the ‘very latest’ in legend formation. This is done through the overt and

sometimes fantastic tales of supernatural occurrences and sightings. Degh states that, “the

repertoire of the tabloids is large and comfortably familiar- variants of classic texts,

revivals of old stories, or retellings of those currently in distribution. In other words, the

repertoire of tabloids is representative living legends” (175). Through the popularity and

dissemination of news-stories and tabloids, we see the human need to find meaning in the

unexplainable.

Bill Ellis has also discussed the importance of social systems in legendry. He

identifies three levels of an emergent legend. First, they emerge as news. Daily headlines

in our local newspapers or programs are perfect conduits for a legend narrative. Second,

they occur as a result of specific social conditions and roles. Here context becomes an

important facet of where and how legends will appear. Thirdly, they embody an

emergency of some kind. Explicating a social dilemma or crisis, much legendry is

centered around socio-cultural problems.

UFO legends fit perfectly into the paradigm of an emergent legend. In fact, the

news-media has just recently been inundated by UFOs and religious imagery. On January

28, 2011, a UFO was filmed over the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem. The footage shows

what appears to be a large glowing orb descend onto the Dome. The UFO hovers for a

few seconds before shooting up and out of sight. News-media across the world covered

the spectacular event and the internet became the preferred platform in which to comment

about the occurrence. For example, the UK website www.telegraph.co.uk reported:

                        UFO HOVERS OVER JERUSALEM SHRINE
                        TWO DIFFERENT FILMS OF A GLOWING BALL HOVERING OVER                THE DOME OF THE ROCK IN JERUSALEM HAS ATTRACTED
                        HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF INTERNET VIEWERS.

The videos show a bright object slowly descending over the Dome of the Rock, an Islamic shrine on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem-believed to be the holiest spot on earth and sacred to three world religions.
A second video taken from a different spot shows a white light descending slowly above Jerusalem, hang in the air directly above the 2500 year old site, and then shoot up into the sky with a gigantic flash.
The event reportedly occurred in Jerusalem at 1am on Friday morning and has provided an online debate as to whether the footage is real.
(www.telegraph.co.uk, February 2, 2011)

            As footage of the UFO spread through cyberspace, bloggers commented on the

sighting. Most of the remarks drew significance on the fact that the UFO appeared in the

Holy Land. One blogger stated, “Most of not all evidence of any contact with UFOs

reveal more of a demonic message than a good one” (2 February 2011, 15:13).

And another anonymous writer remarks, “I grew up in the church too, but it doesn’t mean

everything is demonic. I believe this reasoning makes one deny one’s own spiritual

experiences altogether, hindering our relationship with God and our personal search for

truth. First of all, the assumption that is made is that it’s a demonic alien craft. We saw no

craft. We saw a light. No one knows what it is really: awesome hoax by technically

advanced citizens of Israel, aliens, evil spirits, or a sign from God” (3 February 2011,

13:47).      

            These comments are important because they show the rapidity of legend

dissemination across the internet. The newspaper article provided a platform with which

to discuss UFO phenomenon and in doing so, showed the effects mass media can have on

supernatural legendry. Tabloids also fulfill this role in legend study. By their very nature,

the tabloid is a fantastic narrative. Through its sometimes bizarre accounts of

supernatural happenings, the tabloid is a perfect channel for legend distribution. By

studying tabloids of UFO occurrences, it is possible to identify the religious imagery and

connotations attached to the phenomenon and examine the power these legends have on

peoples belief systems.

A working legend uses belief to transmit meaning in a narrative. Linda Degh

has done extensive work on the study of legend and belief. In fact, she coined the term

‘belief legend’ and by the 1970s, this term became the preferred vernacular on the subject.

According to Degh, all legends are based on belief. She asserts that “belief makes its

presence felt in any kind of legend” (306). Suggesting that legends are stories about

belief, the degrees of belief do not alter this quality of the genre. Degh and her

proponents suggest that belief is not a narrative but the symbolic core of a legend and

because of this, all legends are necessarily “belief legends” (Ward 1991).

            Many academics utilize different means to express the quality of belief in a

legend. Largely differing only in semantics or subtle discrepancies on the importance of

the word ‘belief’ when discussing legendry, folklorists such as Gillian Bennett and Otto

Blehr prefer to use ‘story’ instead of ‘belief’ when discussing this subcategory of legend.

Their reasoning lays in the argument that “belief legends” represent “antiquated traditions

about beliefs that have been handed down in relatively fixed form. “belief stories”, by

contrast, were narrative illustrations of still living belief traditions” (Ward 1991, 360).

Bennett’s “belief story” addresses current community beliefs whereas the “belief legend”

is a fixed narrative that belongs solely to the past.

            Although Degh and Bennett have engaged in discourse concerning beliefs and

legendry, other folklorists have also criticized the “belief legend” for contextual reasons

as well. Lisa Gabbert states that, “I completely agree with Degh and others that the

underlying essence of legends is religious belief or ‘the unknowable’, but disagree that

this is solely what legends scholars should focus on” (114). Gabbert goes on to reiterate

the importance of explicating how belief legends work and why they are important. She

suggests that legend scholars focus too much time on content and not enough on

contextual “everyday” or general belief” (Gabbert 2000).

            UFO-lore shows numerous instances where ‘belief’ has changed traditional

narratives due to contextual circumstances. The most obvious concerns the shifting of the

divine into flying saucers. What was once the domain of angelic beings has now become

the realm of otherworldly space-men. Tumminia has addressed this when she writes that,

“flying saucers have become postmodern myths. With the dawning of the rational

technological age, social scientists expected secularization and science to wipe out

supernatural and magical religions. Instead, a magical enchanted worldview subverted the

scientific paradigm into an animistic account of space beings what was readily available

for our mass consumption” (115). In other words, traditional legendry of heavenly beings

has shifted into our perception of extraterrestrial visitors due to changes in context.

            Furthermore, the communal need for the sacred promotes changes in legendry in

order to satisfy the social status quo. Lindahl has remarked about this when he states that,

“modern society has shed a good deal of its reliance on the divine, and replaced it with

faith in technology. The sky, once invoked as the home of the gods, was now filled with

aircraft” (7). As times change, legends also adapt to fit the needs of society. Carl Jung

also studied religion and legendry and in regards to UFOs, called the phenomenon a

visionary rumour. He states that, “it is closely akin to the collective visions, of, say, the

crusaders during the siege of Jerusalem, the troops at Mons in the First World War, and

the faithful followers of Pope at Fatima” (8). In other words, UFO legendry works

because of the human need for the sacred. Fulfilling a spiritual role in society, the

otherworldly visitor provides an avenue for the numinous in its various manifestations.   

            UFO narratives are full of religious imagery. Acting as a template, biblical

allegories show many of the characteristics that we see in modern Ufology. For example,

the bible tells us that the prophet Ezekiel saw a burning wheel in the sky. The narrator of

the sacred story states, “The appearance of the wheels and their work [was] like unto the

colour of a beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance and their work

[was] as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel (Ezekiel 1:16). This wheel is very

similar to the saucers made famous by Kenneth Arnold in 1947. Both describe a round

object emitting a supernatural light and performing unconventional maneuvers in the sky.

            UFO folklore also makes use of the wheel or halo symbol in its literature. For

example, the UK tabloid ‘The Sun’ published on October 11 2009, an account of a

circular formation in the Moscow sky. The article describes:

This glowing halo in clouds over Moscow looks like an Independence Day style of attack.

This astonishing ring was spotted over the city and captured on video by stunned locals. It has been described as a “true mystery” by a UFO expert. Scores of supernatural enthusiasts have been gripped by the astonishing footage and speculated it could be an ALIEN MOTHERSHIP. The sighting in the clouds is reminiscent of scenes from the 1996 Hollywood blockbuster Independence Day.

“Whatever it is, its one of the most beautiful and spectacular things I’ve ever seen.”
“Speculation is fever pitch on the internet.”
“This is being discussed in forums, blogs, and email lists all over the world. Some people say it’s a bizarre meteorological effect. Theories range from it being an alien mothership, proof of Russian weather modification technology or a weather weapon- even a sign of the end of the world” (Vince Soodin. The Sun. Oct. 11, 2009).

This account of a round, seemingly supernatural formation is very similar to what we
read in biblical scriptures. Both describe inexplicable objects that are spectacularly

beautiful. There is also a sense of mystery attached to both the biblical wheel and the

halo-like cloud formation that resembled an “alien mothership”. Both narratives make use

of preexisting cultural information to assess what the object is and how it should be

interpreted.......

Friday, July 22, 2011

Modern ideas of the Occult

LEGEND OR TRUTH?

…I was at a party at one of the dorms at college. Someone suggested we have a mock séance. Everyone agreed. We all got around in a circle and clasped hands. We tried contacting various dead spirits. People were laughing. Someone suggested we try to contact the devil. Again, everyone agreed, saying it would be fun. We began contacting him. Suddenly everyone and everything got really quiet. A mysterious gloom came over the room. The guy who was contacting couldn’t speak any longer. All of a sudden one of the girls screamed really loud. She then fainted. When she awoke she started to babble. She said that she had looked in the corner and seen a shadowy figure. He was clothed in black and had a disfigured face. He was laughing hard, in an evil way. It was at that time that she screamed and fainted….

                       
Folklore narrative:
Preserved at USU folklore archives
1975



This occult narrative is a reminder of the fear and mystery associated with supernatural experiences. The occult has always been regarded with a certain sense of trepidation. Whether it be nefarious sorcery, Mothman attack, or revenants stumbling out of local graveyards in search of babies to eat, the occult has always been correlated with dark and unseen forces. The question is why?  What is it about the occult arts and sciences that mainstream culture finds so frightening? The answer can be found in a thorough study of the occult and its effect on modern society.
            Maybe one of the most obvious reasons that the occult is targeted by ultra-conservative Christians is the fact that the phenomenon eludes concise definition. Everybody knows that it appears on the fringes of society, but the characteristics and esoteric qualities of the occult seem to be so vast and far-reaching that it becomes impossible to be classified, categorized, and easily referenced. Jorgenson and Jorgenson state that “knowledge in the esoteric community derives from almost every conceivable source, including Indian and Eastern religions, Greek mythology and philosophy, heretical versions of Christianity, paganism, psychic phenomenon and research, and an odd assortment of anomalies (monsters, UFOs, Atlantis, and pyramids). Characteristically , adherents mix and synthesize these doctrines in complex and confounding ways” (379). Although a sufficient definition of esoteric knowledge, specific aspects of the occult such as demonology and ceremonial magic have been omitted to the detriment of the esoteric community.
            A basic premise of ceremonial magic is that things can be changed on account of the magician’s Will. For the occult practitioner, nothing is permanent; everything is in flux, durable, and subject to inherent properties of change. Even the magician himself is in a constant state of becoming or completion. According to Karin Johannison,

“For the magus, the supernatural coincides with the unusual, the marvelous, the artificial; the laws of nature are not regarded as absolute and can be exceeded by art”. The ceremonial magician is an architect of the universe that focuses on a design conforming with his personal Will. He or she uses his belief in the experience to exact changes in the world around him.
           
The study of belief is essential to gaining a better understanding of how the occult operates and is disseminated through world culture. As folklorist David Hufford succinctly stated, “An understanding of any belief must recognize an implicit claim of reference to the ‘objective’ world (that is, the world out there” (11). Here context is imperative because time and place determine to what extent occult belief is sanctioned in modern society. After all, the Western world is dependent on the rationality that encompasses empirical analysis of scientific data. Many members of society find the entire idea of the occult absurd and without scholarly merit. A contextual understanding of where the occult fits into other spiritual paradigms and institutions is important when discussing occult belief in our communities.
            For many, legitimizing occult belief is directly related to how these beliefs are performed or ritualized. Sarah Pike states that, “ritual practice and other experiential aspects of occult involvement exist in an interdependent relationship with belief. Systems of belief cannot be fully understood apart from the ways in which they are expressed and experienced” (357). Here experience is key because it is the supernatural experience that is interpreted through ritual and/or performance. These folk beliefs are socially constructed based upon their perceptions of the supernatural event.
            Also, cultures around the world often accept the presence of the occult in their social and religious structures. This cultural inheritance helps to maintain cohesion and order in their social systems. Essentially being ‘what they are brought up to know’, the occult and demonology are not fantastic but a regular occurrence in people’s lives. A part of tradition, belief in the supernatural is acquired in the same way as language. It becomes both common knowledge and folk belief simultaneously.
            The distinction of common knowledge belief and folk belief becomes blurred in societies where science and religion compliment one another to explain natural and supernatural occurrences. In societies where the sun is both an astronomical body that works off of nuclear fusion and a creator deity that bestows the gift of life, the folk belief becomes as legitimate as scientific certainty. The occult finds meaning in a kind of science-based metaphysics that supports the folk belief as objectively true while relying on empirical and/or rational data to explain its form.
            In addition to studies of belief, legend formation is essential to understanding the folklore of the occult. Legends provide a platform with which occult-lore is disseminated in society. Some of these legends are very well known, such in the case of Hiram Abiff or Christian Rosenkreutz. Other legends are more obscure, as in the skrying visions of John Dee and Edward Kelley. Still others appear as horrifying cautionary tales that give novice practitioners the bends when dabbling in occult ritual. We see evidence of this in a narrative about Aleister Crowley. As recounted by Dennis Wheatley, “Aleister had a disciple named MacAleister (Aleister’s son), who performed a ceremony to summon the god Pan. Their rite was all too successful: in the morning the disciple was found dead and Crowley was temporarily driven insane” (Wheatley 1956, 1971). A nightmarish story to be sure. But what is the truth of the legend? And are legends supposed to be based on fact? Folkloristics tells us that legends are ‘purported’ to be true and regarded as events that could actually happen. However, the study of legends is ripe with a myriad of definitions as characteristics. For example, Bill Ellis states that “whatever else we could propose a legend to be, it is not an underlying plot but rather a social impetus to create new narratives in the shape of the old” (125) Ah, finally some insights into legend formation. A legend is a modern derivative of a more traditional folkloric form. A sound theory if we consider the demonic characteristics of ufology’s Men In Black, or the Mothman’s uncanny similarities to ancient devils and monsters. Who says the Chupacabra or Jersey Devil are strictly modern creatures? In reality, they are variations of folklore from the past. What we see in these legends are narratives that rely on belief to be perpetuated. Linda Degh is absolutely correct when she remarks that “Belief makes its presence felt in any kind of legend” (1976:306). Without some element of belief, the legend isn’t viable as a part of tradition.
            Occult legends certainty make use of belief as they move through popular culture. A classic example can be found in the original marketing and advertising of 1999’s ‘Blair Witch Project’. The best part of this film was the idea that it was based on ‘true events’. The internet website was equipped with mock newspaper headlines and interviews with residents of the town. The disappearance of the college students was relayed as an actual event and even documentaries were created about the witch herself. The result was a powerful legend of modern witchcraft.
            Popular media plays off the fear we have of the unknown or mysterious. In fact, statistical surveys show that almost one-fifth of the American population has frequently experienced paranormal events, including extrasensory perception, clairvoyance, and communication with the dead” (Bennett 1999). The popular media becomes representative of the folklore that is disseminated through society. Having its proverbial finger on the pulse of society’s beliefs, popular media transmits traditional folklore and also makes use of modern variants to tell these stories.
            At the beginning of this discussion, we asked “What is it about the occult that society finds so frightening?” Could it be that conservative aspects of modern culture largely consider occultists one step removed from a padded cell? Maybe it’s the Simon Magus syndrome and mainstream society prays with all their hearts to pull a St Peter and stomp the wily sorcerer into a gelatinous substance. Whatever the case may be, modern society believes in the occult like they believe in an abscessed tooth. Something to be grabbed by the root and swiftly yanked until no trace remains except a goofy gap in an un-anesthetized smile. Say it ain’t so. What these conservatives fail to understand is that these are stories that have been around since early man first burned himself on the deitic campfire. These narratives speak to us of spirits, angels, and theophanic realization. They are archetypes that transcend the test of time. As legends, they are a way to touch the anima of contemporary society. As oral traditions, they help provide cultural stability. And maybe most importantly, the folklore of the occult sheds light on the mysteries that permeate everyday life.
 

















BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bennett, Gillian. Alas, poor ghost! Logan. Utah State University Press, 1999.

Degh, Linda. Legend and Belief. Bloomington. Indiana University Press, 2001.

Ellis, Bill. Aliens, Ghosts, and Cults. Jackson. University Press of Mississippi, 2001.

Hufford, David J. “Beings Without Bodies: An Experienced-Centered Theory Of The Belief In Spirits.” In Out Of The Ordinary: Folklore And The Supernatural. Ed. Barbara Walker. Logan. Utah State University Press, 1995.

Jorgenson, Danny L. and Jorgenson, Lin. “Social meanings of the occult.” The Sociological Quarterly. Vol. 23 No. 3. (Summer 1982): 373-389.

Johannison, Karin. “Magic, Science, and Institutization in the 17th and 18th Centuries”. In Hermeticism and the Renaissance: Intellectual history and the occult in early modern Europe. Ed. Ingrid Merkel. 1988 pg 252.

Pike, Sara M. “Forging magical selves: Gendered bodies and ritual fires at Neo-pagan festivals.” In Magical Religion And Modern Witchcraft. Ed. James R. Lewis. Albany. State University Of New York Press, 1996.

Wheatley, Dennis. The Devil And His Works. New York: New York American Heritage Press, 1971.     

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Is my Ouija evil or just good wholesome family fun?

Hello everybody! Wanted to share a small article with you that concerns Rumor panics and Ouija boards. It seems they go together like peanut butter and jelly. Or wine and cheese. Or Halloween and candy. Ok, enough of the wry comparisons. Suffice to say, the Ouija makes Conservative Christians weep and rage. Read on. :)


Is Ouija a gateway to hell?

In an unprecedented turn of events, conservative Christians are crying foul over Toys-R- Us decision to promote sell of Ouija boards to children as young as eight years old!

This version of the popular board game is marketed towards eight-year-old girls and comes in a pink edition. OneNewsNow correspondent Charlie Butts reports that a representative of Human Life International has visited the Toys-R-Us website and “finds it troubling that these things are treated as casually as any other game, like monopoly or anything else – and I think its something Christians should be aware of and really not support.” The Communications Manager of HLI goes on to note that “we’re supposed to deal with the truth only. We’re supposed to have nothing to do with dark spirits. We’re not supposed to have nothing to do with dark spirits. We’re not supposed to dabble in anything that would compromise our souls, and that’s exactly what this does.”[1]

The suggestion that Ouija boards are a quick way to enter the seventh circle of hell is common in popular media of the occult. In both films and television, accounts of young people meddling with dark forces usually ends up with the poor kids locked in a bitter struggle with the demonic over their very souls. Sometimes things are flung across the room by unseen hands; sometimes pea soup is flung in the face of an exorcising priest. And the folklore of the occult reinforces these perceptions of the Ouija board. For example, a narrative collected by a BYU student and preserved at the Utah State University folklore archives describes:

In John Hall, at BYU, a boy got hold of a Ouija board and had his friends come over so they could try it out. They asked the board if it was controlled by the devil and the marker went to YES. They asked him if he would appear to them, and the marker went to NO. They then asked him if he would appear to just one of them and the marker went to YES. All but one of the boys left the room, and after they had been outside a few minutes they heard a lot of banging around and commotion in the room. They also heard the roommate crying out “Get away from me!” They tried to get back in the room, but found the door locked. After a few minutes, it was silent and they found that the door was now open. When they went inside, they found the furniture scattered all over the room and their roommate was all cut up and laying unconscious.

The fear of the Ouija board as commodified and disseminated through popular culture takes the form of what folklorists call ‘rumor panic’. In a typical rumor panic, irrationality begets collective delusions in a given populace. These panics have taken the form of anything from cattle mutilations to UFO abductions. The occult has had numerous incidences where anxieties of its ‘dark forces’ has led to rumor panic. In fact, in the 1960’s “communities were shocked by rumors that Satanists were holding occult ceremonies and exhuming graves for the purposes of black magic” (Barham 1973). [2] Much like fears of rampaging Satanists running amok through cemeteries and digging up the recently deceased, the Ouija board instills a very real fear in conservative Christians. Whether the rumor panic is unfounded is beside the point because the ‘panic’ itself feeds off of irrationality. With that said, although it is the opinion of this scholar that the phenomena is absurd to the point of laughability, I’m still not gonna be talking to any spirits via the Ouija any time soon.    

                       


[1] @ Courtesy OneNewsNow 2/3/2010
[2] Barham, Tony. 1973 Witchcraft in the Thames Valley. Bourne end, England: Spurbooks.

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Baphomet's Boon

Hello everybody! So my brilliant graphic designer designed a picture of the mysterious Baphomet last month and I've been thinking about that magickal archetype ever since. Decided to include an article about it in next month's run so here's an excerpt. It's unedited but you'll get the idea! Enjoy.



Baphomet’s Boon

It appears like a devil. Cloven-hooved with goat features and horns on its head. It conjures up images of the demonic. Instant feelings of foreboding and precariousness are evoked when just looking at this seemingly monstrous entity. It is Baphomet. Recognized and popularized by many occult groups, the being known as Baphomet is enveloped in mystery and mysticism. How could something that appears so ‘evil’ be important to groups such as the Knights Templar and their modern equivalents? Did this demon bring about the downfall of the Templar and does it continue to maliciously infect all who dare practice the occult arts? I suspect these questions have passed through the mind of every wary occultist first embarking on the Baphomet legend. Somehow, I imagine our wizarding adept glimpsing this monstrous nightmare and running for the hills in a mad dash of crazed lunacy. Screaming counter-curses and melting into a pool of Hebraic gibberish, the unlucky magician finds himself facedown in a quagmire of frantic paranoia. But Baphomet is largely misunderstood and the boon that accompanies this horrific goat-faced pet can aid anybody who seeks esoteric knowledge. In fact, for many occult practitioners, the idea of Baphomet hearkens back to Gnostic teachings of spiritual awakening. Also reminiscent of P.D. Ouspensky’s idea of ‘Will Action’[1], Baphomet is an archetype of becoming a completed human being. As a symbol of spiritual growth and realization, Baphometic understanding is essential to any novice occult practitioner.
The folklore attached to Baphomet largely takes the form of legendry and superstition. The Templars were rumored to have worshipped the “sabbatic-goat” and this charge was one of many that led to their downfall. According to Piers Paul Read, “Templar priests were said to have omitted the words of consecration during Mass. At secret societies, they worshipped a demon called Baphomet who appeared in the form of a cat, or a skull, or a head with three faces” (Read, 266: 1999). Anybody familiar with cat folklore will instantly recognize the correspondences to witch-lore and magic.
The idea of worshipping a skull has always been prevalent in marginalized religious factions and so it is no surprise that there would be correlations within Bapho-lore. For example, some legends claim that the entire reason for the creation of the Templars was to excavate beneath the Temple Mount in order to retrieve the embalmed head of Jesus Christ.[2] Also, those familiar with the seemingly endless Leonardo Da Vinci conspiracy theories will immediately recognize the connections to Mandaeism and its assertion that St. John the Baptist was the true Christian messiah. This legend takes a myriad of forms and assumptions when taking into account the ubiquitous representations of a symbolic skull in religious art of the past. Works such as Francisco de Zurbaran’s, St. Francis with a skull in his hands, and Guercino’s Et in arcadia ego, include subtle indications of occult ideas in their iconography.  Could this be the reason why the Templars were accused to spitting on the cross and worshipping a disembodied skull? Is this our ass-headed demon we have lovingly attributed the name Baphomet?
If it seems that frantic paranoia and being confounded to the point of frusturated mumbling is a product of Baphometic understanding, then you’re probably on the right track...